Dracula 3000

[Vater Araignee]

The vioces in my head are screaming at my "YOU SHOULD HAVE WATCHED THE TELETUBIES THE ACTING IS BETTER HELL ITS MORE ENTERTAINING"

I'de better stop here because I have a million descriptins for this flick an they all sound like "sombody took a shit in my dvd player and it mutiplide it and plasterd it on my screen" GAG!!

AAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!

[DisturbedMania]

Tried watching it...... blech..... it didn't stay on long.

[Onyx]

Thanks. You just saved me $3.99 on payperview It actually looked like it might be funny but sounds like it was just crap.

[LuthienTheFallen]

god one of the worst vamp movies yet

[The_Dark]

I knew my instincts were right.

[Vater Araignee]

I wish I had 10G I know I could do an inde better

Hell I could do better with a 110 insamatic a viewmaster and no script!

this movie when I think about it is sparking hope in me.

I gotta think some more.

[Scary Guy]

Indie? Hm...

I figured maybe it was a sequel to Vampire 2000 or someting.

[Troy Spiral (13)]

I poked around this one on netflix awhile back, it had really horrificly bad reviews (and netflix reviewers are usually pretty forgiving) glad to see my decision not not to bother with it was probably justified. :laughing:

Dracula 2000 seems to have far more fans. (and itself has been generally pummled by reviews) :whistling:

[Scary Guy]

Dracula 2000 was a good movie but I hated the name because I hated that Y2K hype BS.

At first I thought maybe they were talking about http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0336325/ which is supposed to be the sequil to it but really has nothing to do with it. I've seen that and it was an alright way to waste an evening.