Dubh Aingeal Posted May 16, 2007 Posted May 16, 2007 Linus Torvalds has a sharp retort to Microsoft executives' statements in a Fortune article that Linux violates 235 Microsoft patents. In an emailed response to InformationWeek's Charlie Babcock, Torvalds writes: 'It's certainly a lot more likely that Microsoft violates patents than Linux does.' He added: 'Basic operating system theory was pretty much done by the end of the 1960s. IBM probably owned thousand of really "fundamental" patents... The fundamental stuff... has long, long since lost any patent protection.' Torvalds also commented on Microsoft's stated intention not to sue Linux users: "They'd have to name the patents then, and they're probably happier with the FUD than with any lawsuit."
Troy Spiral (13) Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 Relatively true statement(s) by Linus (if talking about only the back-end of an OS), but calling your opponent a crook doesn't necessarily mean you are not a crook yourself. Just as an example.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.