Homicidalheathen Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Clam diggers for the truely only come out at night croud lol Just saw someone wearing them......they are rather ugly to me. http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...e=WDVW&rd=1
bean Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Meh, they aren't that bad...I'd rather see someone wearing that than someone with really bad cellulite wearing a super short skirt or shorts.
SuZQZ Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Yeah, not the worst I've seen. Personally, I wouldn't buy them. I do wear capris/clam diggers/bermuda's in the warmer weather because I don't wear shorts out in public really (don't have to worrry about seeing my cellulite &/or stretch-marks )
Fierce Critter Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Kinda cute. But I'd have to see them in an entire outfit before I'd say how "goth" or whatever they are.
creatureofthenyte Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 If the woman wears good lookin stuff along with them, then I think they could be hot.
pomba gira Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 I think they're cute... I have a similar pair with buttons on the legs, almost a jodhpur cut. Of course these are some impossibly minuscule size. I mean, I was a tiny little thing as a teen but I never wore a 3... smallest size I can recall wearing was a 5 in high school. WTF is up with all these 0, 1, 3 sizes these days? Don't think there was even such thing as a 0, 1 or XS back in the '70s! Are girls shrinking or what?
n0Mad Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 WTF is up with all these 0, 1, 3 sizes these days? Don't think there was even such thing as a 0, 1 or XS back in the '70s! Are girls shrinking or what? No, sizes are shrinking. I can't remember where, but I read an article that says if you find some vintage pants from the 70s and compared them with brand new pants now, the exact same sized pant would be two sizes smaller. So, if you wear size 3 pants, then you'll need at least a size 5 in vintage clothing. Personally, I like the way men's clothing works. If you have a 34 inch waist, you wear a size 34 pants. A 48 inch waist? Size 48 pants. Same with shoes. A guy wearing size 10 shoes means his foot is 10 inches long.
Head Wreck Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 i read your thread i thought you were on about the car http://www.shorey.net/Auto/American/Ford/1...land)%20f3q.jpg http://www.aussiemusclecarmuseum.com.au/im...s/frontal34.jpg
pomba gira Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 No, sizes are shrinking. I can't remember where, but I read an article that says if you find some vintage pants from the 70s and compared them with brand new pants now, the exact same sized pant would be two sizes smaller. So, if you wear size 3 pants, then you'll need at least a size 5 in vintage clothing. Personally, I like the way men's clothing works. If you have a 34 inch waist, you wear a size 34 pants. A 48 inch waist? Size 48 pants. Same with shoes. A guy wearing size 10 shoes means his foot is 10 inches long. That makes sense. I wear an 18 but I know I'm not bigger than my mom was back in the '70s-'80s when she wore a 14... and we have essentially the same type of figure. And some lines are known for their sizes running way big... Victoria's Secret comes to mind, also Apple Bottoms. I've often thought women's clothing sizes should be more standard, like men's... the problem with that is there's much more variation in body type with women. Sizing women's clothing by waist size doesn't work well 'cos hip size can vary so much from one woman to the next. So it's kind of nice to know that there are certain clothing l ines that are a good fit for you... altho finding which ones they are is helly frustrating.
Onyx Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 No, sizes are shrinking. I can't remember where, but I read an article that says if you find some vintage pants from the 70s and compared them with brand new pants now, the exact same sized pant would be two sizes smaller. So, if you wear size 3 pants, then you'll need at least a size 5 in vintage clothing. Personally, I like the way men's clothing works. If you have a 34 inch waist, you wear a size 34 pants. A 48 inch waist? Size 48 pants. Same with shoes. A guy wearing size 10 shoes means his foot is 10 inches long. Damn. I wish women's sizes were that easy. I can't count the times I've ordered something online and it was too large or too small for me.
Shade Everdark Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 Yeah, not the worst I've seen. Personally, I wouldn't buy them. I do wear capris/clam diggers/bermuda's in the warmer weather because I don't wear shorts out in public really (don't have to worrry about seeing my cellulite &/or stretch-marks ) Uh, not to set your or Msterbeau's hackles up, but I don't exactly remember seeing anything that would necessitate a worry about cellulite, on your person. (I will grant you that I did not make a point of looking closely.)
Destroit Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 .... Once again...HH where do you find this crazy shit? Those look kinda emo to me and friends don't let friends dress emo. 'Nuff said.
Kit Kat P Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 Damn. I wish women's sizes were that easy. I can't count the times I've ordered something online and it was too large or too small for me. and this just one more reason I like men's clothes better
SuZQZ Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 Uh, not to set your or Msterbeau's hackles up, but I don't exactly remember seeing anything that would necessitate a worry about cellulite, on your person. (I will grant you that I did not make a point of looking closely.) Thank you! That means I am successful in camouflaging with clothing. Although I am on the thinner side, like many others there are those body parts that I am less than happy with.
creatureofthenyte Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 I still think those pants are cool. I would have to agree that sizes are getting smaller these days. As for why women have such difficulty with finding the right size that fits, I would have to guess that since alot of clothing, for men or women these days, is Man-made, whoever the men are, that make said clothing, must have been pissed off at their wives on the day the clothes were made. Perhaps the clothing sizing issues are a form of revenge from the makers of the clothes lol... I dunno.
Nienna Posted August 28, 2007 Posted August 28, 2007 I have a pair of black capris and they are cute though i tend to hate capris inhn general. Mine are cargo pant style and flare at the legs. Very cute with knee high boots!
Homicidalheathen Posted August 30, 2007 Author Posted August 30, 2007 Well she was wearing them with the thick heavy chain belt and a tucked in tshirt. I think the long shorts look better as it draws attention away from the hips http://cgi.ebay.ca/Restraint-goth-gothic-p...oQQcmdZViewItem
Homicidalheathen Posted August 30, 2007 Author Posted August 30, 2007 I have a pair of black capris and they are cute though i tend to hate capris inhn general. Mine are cargo pant style and flare at the legs. Very cute with knee high boots! flare at the legs. Thats what I am talking about. I just hate that tight all the way down look. And its uncomfortable.
SuZQZ Posted August 30, 2007 Posted August 30, 2007 flare at the legs. Thats what I am talking about. I just hate that tight all the way down look. And its uncomfortable. Yeh, tight all the way down or peg-legged/tappered only makes ones tush look huge. How can that be a good thing! LOL
jane dazzle Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 I have a few pairs of capris and I love them, but they don't look good on everyone nor do they go well with just anything. I think it just depends on what you are wearing them with.
Homicidalheathen Posted September 3, 2007 Author Posted September 3, 2007 Tis ok if your tall and thin.....short chicks with hips in capris? Heh I look funny. It makes me look even shorter.
tweetspie Posted September 22, 2007 Posted September 22, 2007 Oh man... this thread makes me so sad I refuse to wear capris, due to my GIANT CALVES from walking and riding my bike and jumping around at concerts and clubs. There are some cute ones, though. Cry of Flesh has some kickass capris (they call them quarter pants)... I especially love the Crossfire quarter pants, which I intend on making something similar, but full pants And capris and boots are out of the question, too. I have yet to find a boot that will fit on my calf. Even my room mates ankle boots won't zip up all the way :( I shouldn't be complaining about muscles though lol
Brenda Starrr Posted September 22, 2007 Posted September 22, 2007 flare at the legs. Thats what I am talking about. I just hate that tight all the way down look. And its uncomfortable. I have a few pairs that are tight all the way down and frankly, I rock them. I wear them with stilettos and cute tanks or tees. There is ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with them whatsoever.And, as long as they have a small degree of stretch, they're cute. Now if you want to talk hideous, how about those heinous Tripp chain pants? Those are ugly. Leave the capris alone.
TygerLili Posted September 22, 2007 Posted September 22, 2007 I have a couple pairs of capris because they're comfortable, but, yeah, they're not the most figure flattering item ever invented. Most women seem to be able to find a pair that looks ok, but not great. Even on tall, skinny, modelesque women it makes them look a little boyish. Plus. it is very hard to find a shoe that compliments them and doesn't kill your feet. I'll only wear them with stilletos or pretty high wedge sandals. That is, unless I'm somewhere like there grocery store where I could care less if I look good.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.