Jump to content

Vampire Case


Recommended Posts

Posted

Man in 'vampire sex' case acquittedBy Liza Kapelle

May 05, 2008 08:51pm

Article from: AAPFont size: + -

Send this article: Print Email

AN Adelaide man has been acquitted of assaulting and having unlawful sex with a teenager he met via a vampire website.

A South Australian District Court jury took four hours today to find Warwick Acott, 39, of Seaton, not guilty of one count of having unlawful sex with a teenager he met on vampirefreaks.com, and two counts of assaulting her.

The girl said he stalked her for years with sexually violent messages before pushing his way into her house on June 18, 2006 - when she was 16 - biting her breast, whipping her with a cat o' nine tails and forcing her to perform fellatio.

But Mr Acott said the girl pursued him, telling him he was gorgeous and she wanted to be his slave, after finding his photograph on the vampire website.

He said he was flattered and fascinated when she told him she was a ``pain junkie'' and wanted to be his whore.

He told the jury he'd broken off contact with the girl twice after finding out she had lied about her age.

But he was happy to see her again when she tapped him on the shoulder in a sex shop, and asked him to buy her a whip for her 16th birthday.

He said she invited him home, where he admitted he whipped and bit her - at the girl's request.

But he denied the fellatio occurred, saying he pushed her away when she revealed sex would be unlawful due to her age.

Seventeen is the age of consent in SA unless both parties are 16.

Mr Acott said that after he unleashed a tirade of abuse at her, she warned him she would make him suffer.

The girl admitted a series of lies in her evidence, including that Acott had cut her with a scalpel.

Outside the court, Mr Acott said he was relieved justice had been done.

"All I have to say is I'm very grateful to the jury, I'm pleased they came to the right verdict,'' he said.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23651135-29277,00.html

Posted

16's legal in MI

/buys her a ticket

Posted

I bet she did everything he said she did.....

Young girls often do shit like that for attention, and then change their minds when it comes down to it.

Posted

16's legal in MI

/buys her a ticket

If the above quote was a joke I don't think it is funny.

I don't want to be offensive but I don't care enough to do anything about it right now...

:rant: What the FUCK!

Why do I hear and read these words... ALL over the place? Not just here... my local bar..cafe...Ren.Fest...Club...

I Google for you; IGNORANT JACKS OF ASSES!

AGE OF CONCENT LAW

750.520e Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree; misdemeanor.

Sec. 520e.

(1) A person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree if he or she engages in sexual contact with another person and if any of the following circumstances exist:

(a) That other person is at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age, and the actor is 5 or more years older than that other person.

SO... unless you are UNDER 21... COLD!GO TAKE A SHOWER... COLD!!!!!

THANK-YOU FOR YOUR TIME...

Posted

Welcome to Reading Comprehension 101:

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-328-1931-LXXVI

Here is the direct link from the Michigan Government's site.

I will be using Criminal Sexual Conduct in the First Degree to prove you're wrong.

That other person is at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age, and the actor is 5 or more years older than that other person.

Please note the bold print. What does this mean? If two people have sex, and the younger is 13, 14, or 15 and the older is MORE than 5yrs older than that age, you are guilty of committing statutory rape.

Please go read every line of Chapter LXXVI section 750 of the Michigan Penal code. There is not one place that states the legal age of consent is 18, or 16 with a 5yr prerequisite. That is only the case if the younger is between the ages of 13 and 15.

The legal age of consent is 16.

Once they are 16 they can fuck anyone 13 to 120, as long as there is mutual consent.

Glad I could clear up your ignorance, thank you for your time.

If the above quote was a joke I don't think it is funny.

I don't want to be offensive but I don't care enough to do anything about it right now...

:rant: What the FUCK!

Why do I hear and read these words... ALL over the place? Not just here... my local bar..cafe...Ren.Fest...Club...

I Google for you; IGNORANT JACKS OF ASSES!

AGE OF CONCENT LAW

SO... unless you are UNDER 21... COLD!GO TAKE A SHOWER... COLD!!!!!

THANK-YOU FOR YOUR TIME...

Posted

click

OR READ...exactly the same fucking words as were on the FIRST site I linked...on the site YOU linked...

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)

Act 328 of 1931

***** 750.520e THIS SECTION IS AMENDED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2008: See 750.520e.amended *****

750.520e Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree; misdemeanor.

Sec. 520e.

(1) A person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree if he or she engages in sexual contact with another person and if any of the following circumstances exist:

(a) That other person is at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age, and the actor is 5 or more years older than that other person.

(b) Force or coercion is used to accomplish the sexual contact. Force or coercion includes, but is not limited to, any of the following circumstances:

(i) When the actor overcomes the victim through the actual application of physical force or physical violence.

(ii) When the actor coerces the victim to submit by threatening to use force or violence on the victim, and the victim believes that the actor has the present ability to execute that threat.

(iii) When the actor coerces the victim to submit by threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim, or any other person, and the victim believes that the actor has the ability to execute that threat. As used in this subparagraph, “to retaliate” includes threats of physical punishment, kidnapping, or extortion.

(iv) When the actor engages in the medical treatment or examination of the victim in a manner or for purposes which are medically recognized as unethical or unacceptable.

(v) When the actor achieves the sexual contact through concealment or by the element of surprise.

© The actor knows or has reason to know that the victim is mentally incapable, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless.

(d) That other person is related to the actor by blood or affinity to the third degree and the sexual contact occurs under circumstances not otherwise prohibited by this chapter. It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this subdivision that the other person was in a position of authority over the defendant and used this authority to coerce the defendant to violate this subdivision. The defendant has the burden of proving this defense by a preponderance of the evidence. This subdivision does not apply if both persons are lawfully married to each other at the time of the alleged violation.

(e) The actor is a mental health professional and the sexual contact occurs during or within 2 years after the period in which the victim is his or her client or patient and not his or her spouse. The consent of the victim is not a defense to a prosecution under this subdivision. A prosecution under this subsection shall not be used as evidence that the victim is mentally incompetent.

(f) That other person is at least 16 years of age but less than 18 years of age and a student at a public or nonpublic school, and the actor is a teacher, substitute teacher, or administrator of that public or nonpublic school. This subdivision does not apply if the other person is emancipated or if both persons are lawfully married to each other at the time of the alleged violation.

(2) Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $500.00, or both.

Posted

What you just quoted proves me right and you wrong.

The fact that you are having an argument over morals on DGN is hilarious, especially when you're not only wrong but the references you are posting to back your claim proves you are wrong.

750.532 Seduction; punishment.

Sec. 532.

Punishment—Any man who shall seduce and debauch any unmarried woman shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 5 years or by fine of not more than 2,500 dollars; but no prosecution shall be commenced under this section after 1 year from the time of committing the offense.

We're all going to jail.

Posted

We're all going to jail.

YES...and THAT'S funny! :thumbup::rofl:

se·duce /sɪˈdus, -ˈdyus/

–verb (used with object), -duced, -duc·ing.

1. to lead astray, as from duty, rectitude, or the like; corrupt.

2. to persuade or induce to have sexual intercourse.

Posted

I thought I had something more to say, but it was not very nice, so I changed my mind.....

perv

Posted

What you just quoted proves me right and you wrong.

The fact that you are having an argument over morals on DGN is hilarious, especially when you're not only wrong but the references you are posting to back your claim proves you are wrong.

750.520e Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree; misdemeanor.

Sec. 520e.

(1) A person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree if he or she engages in sexual contact with another person and if any of the following circumstances exist:

(a) That other person is at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age, and the actor is 5 or more years older than that other person.

Is my quote...how do you figure that I am wrong in interperating that?

IN ADDITION..Goth does not equal moral less...

Posted

According to the State Police. There is an amendment to the law that changed the age of consent from 16 to 17 in Michigan. No I don't know the number of the new statute. Had an incident in a chatroom and age came up. No I wasn't involved directly in it but legal age become a topic of discussion and someone called the state police and asked and was told it is now 17. Plus if you do a google search for age of consent laws. It lists 17 as legal age for Michigan. They used to list it as 16 till a few years ago.

Posted

***** 750.520e THIS SECTION IS AMENDED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2008: See 750.520e.amended *****

I'm just pointing that out...

Posted

Is my quote...how do you figure that I am wrong in interperating that?

AT LEAST 13 (they are above the age of twelve) but LESS THAN 16 (they are 15 or less years old). In other words, they are 13, 14, or 15 years old.

The age of consent in the state of Michigan is 16 years old.

IN ADDITION..Goth does not equal moral less...

Morals are opinions. As such there's no such thing as one being "moral less". However, arguing over sexual morals on here is just amusing to me.

By the way, if you feel like being outraged, the age of consent in Puerto Rico is 14.

Posted

***** 750.520e THIS SECTION IS AMENDED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2008: See 750.520e.amended *****

I'm just pointing that out...

(v) The actor is an employee or a contractual service provider of the public school, nonpublic school, school district, or intermediate school district in which that other person is enrolled, or is a volunteer who is not a student in any public school or nonpublic school, or is an employee of this state or of a local unit of government of this state or of the United States assigned to provide any service to that public school, nonpublic school, school district, or intermediate school district, and the actor uses his or her employee, contractual, or volunteer status to gain access to, or to establish a relationship with, that other person.

this is the added portion that goes into effect on 4/1/08. This is the only change to the sexual conduct laws for the state of Michigan.

Once again, age of consent is still 16.

Posted

Age Smage.....Wrong is wrong

Posted

AT LEAST 13 (they are above the age of twelve) but LESS THAN 16 (they are 15 or less years old). In other words, they are 13, 14, or 15 years old.

The age of consent in the state of Michigan is 16 years old.

Morals are opinions. As such there's no such thing as one being "moral less". However, arguing over sexual morals on here is just amusing to me.

By the way, if you feel like being outraged, the age of consent in Puerto Rico is 14.

I see... thanx for the law lesson...I must concede...I read it incorrectly...

How are morals merely opinions? It seems to me that morals are a collective decision, an agreement, to bind society into a whole...the foundation on which law and order are built...(albeit theoreticaly).

mor·al

–adjective

1. of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes.

2. expressing or conveying truths or counsel as to right conduct, as a speaker or a literary work; moralizing: a moral novel.

3. founded on the fundamental principles of right conduct rather than on legalities, enactment, or custom: moral obligations.

4. capable of conforming to the rules of right conduct: a moral being.

–noun

11. morals, principles or habits with respect to right or wrong conduct.

Posted

How are morals merely opinions? It seems to me that morals are a collective decision, an agreement, to bind society into a whole...the foundation on which law and order are built...(albeit theoreticaly).

Morals are the "collective" decision of those in power to control the populace around it. The proof lies in history. Why do you think there are so many conflicting morals in the world, all claiming to be correct with absolutely no definitive proof? Sounds like a matter of opinion to me.

Yes, I will agree that there are some morals that seem to be such simple common sense that almost everyone agrees on them; "The Golden Rule". But they are still matters of opinion.

Rather than just plagiarize, I'll simply point to Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers. Therein lies the greatest argument against any sort of "basic human morality" ever devised.

edit:

Posting a definition of the word reads like posting bible quotes to prove that the bible is real. The definition points to "codes of right and wrong"... well if you've paid any attention at all to world events, you should have realized that there is no such thing as "right and wrong". Once again, all a matter of opinion.

Posted

Posting a definition of the word reads like posting bible quotes to prove that the bible is real. The definition points to "codes of right and wrong"... well if you've paid any attention at all to world events, you should have realized that there is no such thing as "right and wrong". Once again, all a matter of opinion.

I just like seeing where people are 'coming from'...

Thanx...carry on, sir...

Posted

I never cared for that site,its all emo and tween teens.

also people on some of those sites like to lie about their age just to get someone else in trouble,IMO.nough said.

Posted

I bet she did everything he said she did.....

Young girls often do shit like that for attention, and then change their minds when it comes down to it.

I never cared for that site,its all emo and tween teens.

also people on some of those sites like to lie about their age just to get someone else in trouble,IMO.nough said.

I completely agree with both of these posts. That is all, continue the debate... :coffee:

Posted

I completely agree with both of these posts. That is all, continue the debate... :coffee:

The debate was OVER...HOURS ago darling...hehehe

...I can not read law...that's it...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    821.8k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 15 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.