Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 you wrong sir so as punishment now your my slave!
taysteewonderbunny Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 you wrong sir so as punishment now your my slave! But that just begs the question.
Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 what question? Quit being so vauge?
taysteewonderbunny Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 (edited) what question? Quit being so vauge? As I should so chastise you! You assert that he is wrong, but provide no evidence, offering instead that as consequence, he should suffer consequences. I call you out boldly, young lady, give support to your argument or else I shall be forced to correct your spelling. (Pbbbt!) Edit to add: btw, I know that he is wrong. I just want to see if you know why because I was quite perplexed at his daring (and unfounded) assertions. Edited February 13, 2009 by taysteewonderbunny
Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 He is wrong because you touch your self at night
taysteewonderbunny Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 He is wrong because you touch your self at night And since I am wrong and two wrongs make a right, I am right all night long! Good girl! I give you a lollipop!
Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 And since I am wrong and two wrongs make a right, I am right all night long! Good girl! I give you a lollipop! YUM! and Rev my slave too
StormKnight (1) Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 If you two are right, does that make inventors of powered flight? Two wrongs don't make a right. This is not math.
Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 Yeah stormknight what is this tread but a huge story problem?
StormKnight (1) Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 No...and gods forbid that we get into calculus, I do NOT want to talk about a math science that was created by a guy who never got laid in his life (Newton).
phee Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 I think there is a lot of wrong in this thread... I am glad I am right
Rev.Reverence Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 No...and gods forbid that we get into calculus, I do NOT want to talk about a math science that was created by a guy who never got laid in his life (Newton). YOU SIR...ARE WRONG & OUT OF LINE! NEWTON DID HIS CUTE LAB ASSISTANT.....SO WHAT IF IT WAS A DUDE...COUNTS!
phee Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 I am sorry.... your background does not support such statements.... so therefore you are not correct.
Rev.Reverence Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 I have never read anything SO wrong anywhere.
phee Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 I have never read anything anywhere. Fixed your post so that it supports my point of view more
Rev.Reverence Posted February 14, 2009 Posted February 14, 2009 Everyone is wrong. I am right. You're right...everyone IS wrong...good thing I'm a nobody instead of an everybody...that makes ME... . . C O R E C T T ! ! ~!
Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 You're right...everyone IS wrong...good thing I'm a nobody instead of an everybody...that makes ME... . . C O R E C T T ! ! ~! Wrong
Jessika Fxckin rocks (1) Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 ..wronger than that! wrongest
Lacilliyr Posted August 22, 2011 Posted August 22, 2011 You are all wrong due to a fundamental flaw in your mathematics. It's not that two wrongs make a right, but instead three lefts make a right.
Simon Bar Sinister Posted August 24, 2011 Posted August 24, 2011 no, three lefts make a knocked the fuck out.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now