Msterbeau Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 We've been seeing ideas for this since before the Jetsons cartoons. The basics of the technology have already been demonstrated to work, but not yet close to what is required for the real world. What are your thoughts? http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/fu...ving-part-1.ars
Gaf The Horse With Tears Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 People are not allowed to be within reach of a robot when it's "working" for a reason. Until there are major strides in AI, no, we do not need a new way to get ourselves killed.
Msterbeau Posted September 30, 2008 Author Posted September 30, 2008 Until there are major strides in AI, no, we do not need a new way to get ourselves killed. Yup. Granted... "robots" in most cases (In factories) are only programmed to do one thing, They are not designed to interact at all except with the task at hand. I see the possibility of self driving cars within our lifetimes, but it will be in small steps.
Destroit Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 In Soviet Russia, car drives you. (Sorry, couldn't help myself)
Homicidalheathen Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 in one way it would be good...no more pile ups from tailgaters but trusting your life to machinery? naw... http://www.antony-anderson.com/cruise/6-freq.htm i heard a story about a cruise control that got stuck and caused an accident...and fear the same sort of thing might happen
freydis Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 In Soviet Russia, car drives you. (Sorry, couldn't help myself) *snort*
Head Wreck Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 you can buy Audi A3's over here with Automated Reverse parking. all the driver has to do during tp process is put the car in 1st gear when it asks, steering clutch and gas are all automated. not available yet on other audi models, a college in work scoffed its because the A3 is a womans car
Rev.Reverence Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 People are not allowed to be within reach of a robot when it's "working" for a reason. Until there are major strides in AI, no, we do not need a new way to get ourselves killed. +as many as I can be
Troy Spiral (13) Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 In the long term yeah sure. There are plenty of automated tasks that "a machine couldn't do" that are almost exclusively done by machines now. Shorter term its just another one in a long string of yet-to-be-realized technologies. Machines will repair themselves, design themselves and pick their own jobs at some point. Driving a car will be fairly simple for A. I. at some point. If we manage not to blow ourselves up the level to which artificial intelligence will get is a bit scary. Once machines can start designing themselves better than a human can design them (parts of this are already true) and they can start to "think" in abstract terms and learn, the speed at which they will learn will outstrip the speed at which human learning evolves. Thus creating the predicted "Singularity", to oversimplify: The idea is, eventually A.I. could get so advanced that it trying to talk to us about its higher thought processes and new ideas would be like us trying to explain long division to a goldfish. Which, even though it sounds far fetched at first glance, seems plausible given enough time. Originally a sci-fi concept, now taken fairly seriously in many segments of the scientific community.
Rev.Reverence Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 In the long term yeah sure. There are plenty of automated tasks that "a machine couldn't do" that are almost exclusively done by machines now. Shorter term its just another one in a long string of yet-to-be-realized technologies. Machines will repair themselves, design themselves and pick their own jobs at some point. Driving a car will be fairly simple for A. I. at some point. If we manage not to blow ourselves up the level to which artificial intelligence will get is a bit scary. Once machines can start designing themselves better than a human can design them (parts of this are already true) and they can start to "think" in abstract terms and learn, the speed at which they will learn will outstrip the speed at which human learning evolves. Thus creating the predicted "Singularity", to oversimplify: The idea is, eventually A.I. could get so advanced that it trying to talk to us about its higher thought processes and new ideas would be like us trying to explain long division to a goldfish. Which, even though it sounds far fetched at first glance, seems plausible given enough time. Originally a sci-fi concept, now taken fairly seriously in many segments of the scientific community. *in movie voice* ..then it will be dooms day... ..good thing I already have a proper post-apocalyptic hair cut...(ya' never know when that silly old appocolypse will hit...boyscout motto..BE PREPARED)
SaGa Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 its a long ways away. they will probly hit it up slowly. like put in wirelesss transmittable speed caps first on newer cars. its about 50 years thou before these self drivable cars whould be out, bye then they will have everything automated enough where cars will just "talk to eachother" so there whould be less visual sensors. its just going to happen so slowly no one will notice. since people still drive older cars that wont have these gps and wireless communication. it botches the self driving car system a bit.
sass_in_the_pants Posted September 30, 2008 Posted September 30, 2008 I don't care. I want a flying car. I can't die until I have a flying car. Do these robots text while they're driving? No? Bring em on then, bring em on.
Msterbeau Posted October 1, 2008 Author Posted October 1, 2008 its a long ways away. they will probly hit it up slowly. like put in wirelesss transmittable speed caps first on newer cars. its about 50 years thou before these self drivable cars whould be out, bye then they will have everything automated enough where cars will just "talk to eachother" so there whould be less visual sensors. its just going to happen so slowly no one will notice. since people still drive older cars that wont have these gps and wireless communication. it botches the self driving car system a bit. Much of the technologies in terms of mechanics and sensors is already here. What's lacking is the brainpower to harness it all to the degree needed to take in all the info , process it and make decisions. Something we do easily.
SaGa Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 Much of the technologies in terms of mechanics and sensors is already here. What's lacking is the brainpower to harness it all to the degree needed to take in all the info , process it and make decisions. Something we do easily. well i wasnt speaking technology. thats the easy part. its getting it into the system and putting trust into it... if all cars where automated, it be a easy step, but when a non automated car does something unpredictable and the ai does not see it coming. it could mean a nice accident. one huge step whould be getting all cars tagged onto gps type systems. or the most reliable system. im sure the goverment whouldnt mind doing THAT. now the people on the other hand whould fight that one for a while. this is being worked on for a while. im sure it will be law in 5-10 years
Simon Bar Sinister Posted October 1, 2008 Posted October 1, 2008 kinda related, I guess...the USAF plans to phase out human fighter pilots by the mid-'20s.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.