Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

YAY!

Posted

Oh woohoo. Now the Senate can act like the House and pass bills without reading them too. /end sarcasm

God I wish for the days of Checks and Balances or the two party system.

Posted

Oh woohoo. Now the Senate can act like the House and pass bills without reading them too. /end sarcasm

God I wish for the days of Checks and Balances or the two party system.

heh

I knew you would say something about this one sir.

Posted

God I wish for the days of Checks and Balances or the two party system.

Kinda like i did 6 years ago

Posted

Kinda like i did 6 years ago

+1

Posted

I say good for him.

Posted

"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough and doggone it, people like me"

Posted

Kinda like i did 6 years ago

No, 6 years ago we did not have a President and a super majority in both Houses all of the same party. 6 years ago members of Congress actually were given time to and encouraged to read the Bills they voted on.

Posted

Oh woohoo. Now the Senate can act like the House and pass bills without reading them too. /end sarcasm

God I wish for the days of Checks and Balances or the two party system.

I did not notice 2 distinct & separate parties...not since I looked..I mean, I read it in me H.S. history book, that that's how we do it 'round here...but, I have yet to see it "in action"...I see the Republicrats doing whatever they want...whenever they want.

..hey you guys, I thought Al Franken was a comedian.

Posted

No, 6 years ago we did not have a President and a super majority in both Houses all of the same party. 6 years ago members of Congress actually were given time to and encouraged to read the Bills they voted on.

We don't have it today either.

Sens Byrd and Kennedy are laid up so it's 58-40, two shy of a filibuster-proof 60.

Not to mention that you've got both progressives and conservatives WITHIN the democratic party who are

not going to vote with the Dems on numerous votes.

Because they are not lockstep with the party (2 are independents and aren't even IN the party anyway) and would never just go along because Reid or Obama asked them to.

-----------------

As for Franken, huzzah!

I'm glad someone was able to reclaim the progressive mantle in MN after Wellstone passed away.

Ironically, Franken is going to surprise a lot of you for being more low-key and even a bit more conservative

than the fearlless activist the US Senate had in Wellstone.

Posted

We don't have it today either.

Sens Byrd and Kennedy are laid up so it's 58-40, two shy of a filibuster-proof 60.

Not to mention that you've got both progressives and conservatives WITHIN the democratic party who are

not going to vote with the Dems on numerous votes.

Because they are not lockstep with the party (2 are independents and aren't even IN the party anyway) and would never just go along because Reid or Obama asked them to.

-----------------

As for Franken, huzzah!

I'm glad someone was able to reclaim the progressive mantle in MN after Wellstone passed away.

Ironically, Franken is going to surprise a lot of you for being more low-key and even a bit more conservative

than the fearlless activist the US Senate had in Wellstone.

Though your words do give me a little hope the fact remains that Democrats in Congress are forcing votes on Bills that no one has read.

Posted

He first became famous as a writer and a performer for the television show Saturday Night Live (SNL)

:rofl:

YUP! I was right...we now have a REAL CLOWN in Senate...NOW, we are getting somewhere!

Posted

Yes... at least he is honest

Posted

That remains to be seen. I will give him credit though, if he sticks to what he is saying in his various speeches, that he is the 2nd Senator from rather the the 60th Dem....

Posted

That remains to be seen. I will give him credit though, if he sticks to what he is saying in his various speeches, that he is the 2nd Senator from rather the the 60th Dem....

I saw Harry Reid on the news alittle while ago, and he claims it is not the democrats intention, with Franken now on staff, to "ram" bills through congress........

BS times infinity !!!!

Posted

Well, it was Reid.. he is a walking ethics violation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    821.8k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 17 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.