What you want the opposite sex to wear thread

[Joey Deadcat]

[Joey Deadcat]

I've also come to realize and accept that I dig the women who have as little tats and piercings as possible.

[Joey Deadcat]

[Raev]

Attitude and confidence.

[Troy Spiral (13)]

Skirts. Tight stuff. Shiny stuff. Black I like black. (random color accents can be nice) Love the racoon-level eye makeup.

[deadcoldgothgirl]

Skirts. Tight stuff. Shiny stuff. Black I like black. (random color accents can be nice) Love the racoon-level eye makeup.

Thank you. I get so many people telling me that the look is out dated and ugly. If I want to wear 20 layers of eye liner on my eye and tastefully shadow the crap out of them I should be able to. I like the look and it makes me happy. But you proved my point that it is still a classic.

[Simon Bar Sinister]

pretty much nails it right there.

[Simon Bar Sinister]

[Joey Deadcat]

[Joey Deadcat]

[Class-Punk]

The choppy pixie haircut.

[Shaun]

[*Siren*]

I have to put this out there because I'm seeing this epidemic a lot.... If you are a guy... Wear a d@%n shirt that fits you. If you want to wear baggy pants that's cool. Just don't wear pants that are so tight your privates have no room to move. But for the love of god don't wear a shirt that is five times what you should be wearing. My fiance does that because he is as thin as a twig. It annoys the ever living crap out of me. He should be in a medium and instead he wears a two X. Men this goes for all of you, if you wear a shirt that fits you, you will look better then drowning in one that doesn't.

Agreed. I think someone should tell them that they look like a broomstick in a trash bag. Wearing a huge shirt DOES NOT MAKE YOU LOOK BIGGER!!! Having clothes that hang off of you will only make you look scrawny.

[deadcoldgothgirl]

Agreed. I think someone should tell them that they look like a broomstick in a trash bag. Wearing a huge shirt DOES NOT MAKE YOU LOOK BIGGER!!! Having clothes that hang off of you will only make you look scrawny.

I agree. I also think it makes them look tacky and makes them look like a "gangsta" wanna be.

[*Siren*]

pretty much nails it right there.

I would wear her.

[Goth Brooks]

As long as she's letting me take it off later, I really don't care what she wants to wear. Whatever makes her happy and feel beautiful.

[Vodkabot]

I really like my boyfriend's corp-goth look, as it's a very appealing and suitable look for his age and profession. I like it in general, but really like it on him.

[*Siren*]

I men in kilts.

[Nevar (5)]

The Professional look.

Sometimes the Victorian look.

The Steampunk look.

Nothing...

Totally I agree with the last two.

[Nevar (5)]

I men in kilts.

Well, you should have been at Manfast!

[*Siren*]

Well, you should have been at Manfast!

I missed men in kilts? Aww...

[Nevar (5)]

I missed men in kilts? Aww...

Yes traditional too and decided to wrestle in it.

[n0Mad]

Yes traditional too ...

Traditional would mean it was folded in pleats, made of wool, in a tartan. His was definitely modern meaning sewn in pleats, made of cotton, and a solid color. Plus the design is more modern and not traditional.

What you're thinking of is "regimental" aka, "going commando". It's called regimental because the Scottish army recommended going sans underwear in order to cut supply costs, laundry costs, packing weight, dressing time, et. al. I do not know if the Scottish army still recommends this practice, but the Scottish Tartans Authority (the de facto organization about all things kilts) has actually condemned this practice, stating that "'going comando' flies in the face of decency and is childish and unhygenic."

Director Brian Wilton stated, "The idea that you are not a real Scot unless you are bare under your kilt should be thrown into the same wastepaper basket as the idea that you're not a real Scot unless you put salt on your porridge. People should not be browbeaten into believing that nonsense. Just because Highlanders wore nothing in the days before Y-fronts were invented doesn't mean that we, in the 21st Century, should wear nothing too. Sending children up chimneys is traditional too, but we don't do it now and the same should apply to wearing nothing under a kilt. Common sense and decency suggest that for the majority of occasions one should wear under the kilt what one would wear under a pair of trousers."

Also from the same article, "Kilt maker Slanj, which has provided Highland dress for Billy Connolly and Ewan McGregor, insisted last year that underwear must be worn with hire kilts. The firm, which also made a kilt for self-confessed true Scotsman Sir Sean Connery, said some kilts had been returned in such a dirty state that they were too unhygienic for staff to handle."

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/8149592/Draught-guidance-a-kilt-need-underwear.html

I for one like the freedom, comfort, and sanitation of wearing underwear.

[deadcoldgothgirl]

I would never be able to get matt to wear it to save my life, but a guy in a fishnet shirt and thick black eyeliner.

[Nevar (5)]

Traditional would mean it was folded in pleats, made of wool, in a tartan. His was definitely modern meaning sewn in pleats, made of cotton, and a solid color. Plus the design is more modern and not traditional.

What you're thinking of is "regimental" aka, "going commando". It's called regimental because the Scottish army recommended going sans underwear in order to cut supply costs, laundry costs, packing weight, dressing time, et. al. I do not know if the Scottish army still recommends this practice, but the Scottish Tartans Authority (the de facto organization about all things kilts) has actually condemned this practice, stating that "'going comando' flies in the face of decency and is childish and unhygenic."

Director Brian Wilton stated, "The idea that you are not a real Scot unless you are bare under your kilt should be thrown into the same wastepaper basket as the idea that you're not a real Scot unless you put salt on your porridge. People should not be browbeaten into believing that nonsense. Just because Highlanders wore nothing in the days before Y-fronts were invented doesn't mean that we, in the 21st Century, should wear nothing too. Sending children up chimneys is traditional too, but we don't do it now and the same should apply to wearing nothing under a kilt. Common sense and decency suggest that for the majority of occasions one should wear under the kilt what one would wear under a pair of trousers."

Also from the same article, "Kilt maker Slanj, which has provided Highland dress for Billy Connolly and Ewan McGregor, insisted last year that underwear must be worn with hire kilts. The firm, which also made a kilt for self-confessed true Scotsman Sir Sean Connery, said some kilts had been returned in such a dirty state that they were too unhygienic for staff to handle."

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/8149592/Draught-guidance-a-kilt-need-underwear.html

I for one like the freedom, comfort, and sanitation of wearing underwear.

Sorry, I meant worn Traditional and it was Manfast, he could have came dressed as a cave man and still fit right in.