Jump to content

The Great Ouch Debate


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

While discussing language with a friend, we stumbled upon something that we can't seem to agree on.

And that is, whether or not "ouch" is an actual word.

Crazy it sounds I agree. I say, "ouch" is not a word but an audible sound used solely to describe pain to various degrees. They insist since it is spelled using letters that it is in fact, a word. I disagree with this last part based on the fact that, most any sound can be represented using letters when they are used in print or writing.

Also, some others I have asked about this insist that it should be a word if it isn't already.

To the best of my knowledge the Oxford dictionary is the authority on what constitutes (or is accepted) as official words of the English language.

I have done some research on this and have only found that "ouch" is labeled as a sound to represent pain (to various degrees).

Any general thoughts/ideas are welcomed.

Edited by Scar My Machine
Posted

I think "ouch" would be classified as slang even though the word has been around for a long time.

Posted

Webster's says it's an interjection. It's also a noun... it's the setting for a gemstone on jewlery.

My question is.. if we don;t consider ouch a word... do we throw out all interjections and exclamations?

Posted

Webster's says it's an interjection. It's also a noun... it's the setting for a gemstone on jewlery.

My question is.. if we don;t consider ouch a word... do we throw out all interjections and exclamations?

Dang!

Posted

Well, most words are (or have corresponding) audible sounds. :stuart: But I understand your meaning: to you, "ouch" is merely an audible sound. If that is true, do you mean that no meaning inheres to "ouch?" Whenever you hear "ouch," do you inevitably inquire, "what? What do you mean, 'ouch?'" Or do you respond wanting to know what happened, what degree and what kind of injury occurred?

I suppose if you are going to disqualify things as words because they are onomatopoeia, you will have to rescind the word status of a great many things I would consider words, such as: achoo, ahem, belch, blah, bubble, buzz, clang, crackle, drip, fizz, flutter, growl, gurgle, hiccup, itch, knock, meow, murmur, oink, plop, quack, rattle, screech, snort, twang, twiddle, ugh, vroom, whack, whip, yodel, and zip. What often begins as onomatopoeia becomes a word of greater and even multiple meanings. Some of our words with onomatopoeic origins aren't immediately recognizable as such. "Owl" supposedly began as "oollool," an imitation of its hoot. Similarly, from the exclamation, "ouch" we get its noun-form, "ouchie."

Onomatopoeia are among some of the first words we teach children. The 'See and Say' tells us that "the cow says, 'Moo!'"

What if your argument is that it's not properly onomatopoeia and just an exclamation? I say, "bah humbug," and I don't expect to have to explain myself.

BTW, this is an interesting post. Thank you for making me stretch my brain.

Posted

Well, most words are (or have corresponding) audible sounds. :stuart: But I understand your meaning: to you, "ouch" is merely an audible sound. If that is true, do you mean that no meaning inheres to "ouch?" Whenever you hear "ouch," do you inevitably inquire, "what? What do you mean, 'ouch?'" Or do you respond wanting to know what happened, what degree and what kind of injury occurred?

I suppose if you are going to disqualify things as words because they are onomatopoeia, you will have to rescind the word status of a great many things I would consider words, such as: achoo, ahem, belch, blah, bubble, buzz, clang, crackle, drip, fizz, flutter, growl, gurgle, hiccup, itch, knock, meow, murmur, oink, plop, quack, rattle, screech, snort, twang, twiddle, ugh, vroom, whack, whip, yodel, and zip. What often begins as onomatopoeia becomes a word of greater and even multiple meanings. Some of our words with onomatopoeic origins aren't immediately recognizable as such. "Owl" supposedly began as "oollool," an imitation of its hoot. Similarly, from the exclamation, "ouch" we get its noun-form, "ouchie."

Onomatopoeia are among some of the first words we teach children. The 'See and Say' tells us that "the cow says, 'Moo!'"

What if your argument is that it's not properly onomatopoeia and just an exclamation? I say, "bah humbug," and I don't expect to have to explain myself.

BTW, this is an interesting post. Thank you for making me stretch my brain.

Woah!

(another use of a word that could be disqualified if "ouch" does not count.)

Posted

I have my own dictionary and often can make just about anything a verb ... So I am not one who should be saying anything constructive here ... Lol.

Posted

I had a stunning realization last night as the wine wore off. "Ouch" is NOT onomatopoeia. Doh! And I meant to say 'interjection' in all the places I said 'exclamation.' Doh! Doh!

Sorry I was so lame, and not just lame, but arrogantly so. I offer my figurative self for retribution; let the beatings commence.

Posted

Ya'll needs a better dictionary.

I have in my hand, a solid state PAPER dictionary...from the 90s...& it clearly states:

1ouch

interj. (an exclamation expressing sudden pain)[< G autsch]

2ouch

archaic -n.

*WHAT GAF SAID.

Posted

I, for one, do not say "ouch" to indicate pain. I say something more akin to, "Graaahhh fucking gooohh!!!" or even "Gyah!" Those definitely are not words as they are merely exclamations unique to me that are improvised on the spot. "Ouch", however, is universally accepted across cultures since 1837 and does appear in several dictionaries. It is listed as an interjection which is a valid word category, and as TWB mentioned above, there is the noun derivative, "ouchie". Furthermore, as Gaf indicated but did not expound upon, there is another definition for "ouch":

ouch

–noun

1. a clasp, buckle, or brooch, esp. one worn for ornament.

2. the setting of a precious stone.

–verb (used with object)

3. to adorn with or as if with ouches.

Conclusion: "Ouch" is a word.

Posted

Oh, I forgot “interjection” even existed, except for those chocolate-covered pretzels I ate last night.

Posted

Oh, I forgot "interjection" even existed, except for those chocolate-covered pretzels I ate last night.

"refudiate?"

LOL

Posted

I had no idea so many here would take interest in this debate over a word but it's really cool. I stand corrected, ouch thus - is a word.

Posted

Just my $0.02 in this debate :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP4N27kbMdk

Posted

"refudiate?"

LOL

Pretty much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    821.6k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 25 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.