Leaderboard

You ask to be pointed towards another sociopolitical philosopher and then throw in the name of a reporter you don't want to be pointed too. I have to ask... What the fucks up with that? Define conspiracy nut. Never mind, I'll do it in newspeak. Conspiracy Nut: old: A person, who without a shred of evidence believes there is a conspiracy. new: Anybody the government and media tells you is one regardless of how much evidence that person has. I'm just saying, don't be a glen beckerwood parrot. You think Alex Jones is full of it then prove it. I'll give you one big one to try to debunk. Obvious violations of United States Code Title 18, section 1385. In the face of overwhelming evidence that it is being violated are you capable of debunking it? Lets go with something simpler. Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Go ahead, prove that something that is being violated en masse actually isn't being violated at all. Hey lets go even simpler than that, I mean free speech and all that what not. First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The creation of "Free Speech Zones" and breaking up "Peaceful Protests" isn't a violation right? That man has more reverence for the Constitution than the Beast that says its "Just a piece of paper" and tells you "Not to listen to the conspiracy nuts" and a better understanding of how it is suppose to be used than the Monster claiming it is "It is a flawed document" based on past violates action and tells you "Not to listen to the conspiracy nuts". Does Alex Jones have some far out theories? You betcha! Does this invalidate most of what he is pointing out? NOPE! Just like the rest of the reporters and pundits you have to wade through the bull shit to get to the good stuff, but unlike like them it is there in droves. Now Immanuel Kant has some interesting views and as far as utopias are concerned, no one has come up with a better way of establishing how to figure out if something is. Try out "Critique of Practical Reason" and "Critique of Pure Reason".