Dubh Aingeal Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Eweek.com is reporting a new Microsoft Word zero-day attack underway. Microsoft issued a security advisory to acknowledge the unpatched flaw, which affects Microsoft Word 2000, Microsoft Word 2002, Microsoft Office Word 2003, Microsoft Word Viewer 2003, Microsoft Word 2004 for Mac and Microsoft Word 2004 v. X for Mac. The Microsoft Works 2004, 2005 and 2006 suites are also affected because they include Microsoft Word. Simply opening a word document will launch the exploit. There are no pre-patch workarounds or anti-virus signatures available. Microsoft suggests that users 'not open or save Word files,' even from trusted sources.
Head Wreck Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 erm... theres holes in word 97 that are continued into the latest version of word that were never patched BAD AND VERY BAD "SPY" NEWS The "Document Collaboration Spyware" exploit Alex Gantman posted on Bugtraq on August 26 has hit almost every major news outlet in the world. Much has happened since the flag went up. To summarize: I've got some bad news. And I've got some very bad news. The bad news: Microsoft hasn't done squat for its customers. There's a press release that MS posted in response to Ian Hopper's story for the Associated Press (good story, by the way). You can see MS's Party Line at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/topics/secword.asp . But as far as I know, that's the extent of Microsoft's missives to its customers. Three and a half weeks later, and there's no security bulletin, no official warning, no nothing. The only suggestion Microsoft has come up with - examine field codes in your document manually - is so lame I don't know if I should laugh or cry... or scream. Can *you* look at a field code and know if it will automatically suck in a sensitive file? How can hundreds of millions of Office users be expected to tell the difference between a safe field code and a spy? We now have a tool to help you identify suspect documents - you can see below for details but I know you're impatient so look at http://www.woodyswatch.com/util/sniff More bad news: in the past couple of days I've cobbled together a "spy" document that automatically retrieves the full file names of all documents which are already open when the "spy" document gets opened. (You'll recall that Alex's exploit requires the attacker to know the precise name and location of the file that's being spied upon.) The very bad news: that new file name retrieval "spy" technique works automatically and silently in all versions of Word - 97, 2000, or 2002 (the version in Office XP). Microsoft says "For best security, we recommend that customers use Word 2002." I don't buy it. Microsoft got lucky when it changed the way certain fields were updated in Word 2002 - Alex's original exploit doesn't work automatically in Word 2002. But they weren't looking at Word fields from a security point of view when they sent Office XP out the door, and they missed at least one gaping hole. I've sent seven exploits to Microsoft in the past two weeks. A couple of them are no more than parlor tricks - so far - but most of them look ominous. Several of them work automatically in all versions of Word: Word 97 ain't the only version with its tail hanging out. Microsoft assures me that they're on top of all of the problems I've sent so far. I sure hope so. We here at WOW Central have a tool that will help you identify "bad" fields in Word documents. Keep reading.
Dubh Aingeal Posted December 6, 2006 Author Posted December 6, 2006 Oh I know that. Its just not only is this the lastest hole to be found in their crappy dominating software, but they are telling people to not use it to open the doc's.
Dubh Aingeal Posted December 11, 2006 Author Posted December 11, 2006 A spokesman for Microsoft has said that they will issue no patches on the next 'Patch Tuesday' for versions of Word vulnerable to the recent zero-day threat. There is no mention whatsoever of the omission in the latest advance notification at the company's security site. From the article: The software maker is working on a security update, but apparently needs more time. The company did not specify how many flaws Tuesday's updates will address or in which components of Windows the holes lie. The Visual Studio update could offer a patch for a zero-day vulnerability in the developer tools that was made public last month.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.