This Next Tuesday

[Homicidalheathen]

On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 there will be an eclipse that occurs very close to the actual time of the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 in New York. The attacks on the Pentagon and the downed aircraft in Pennsylvania occurred later on that morning.

I'm interested in the viability of the USA chart set for:

March 18, 1762

Washington, DC

4:41 PM GMT

This is the Jupiter Saturn Conjunction that occurred prior to US Independence. I know that Washington DC did not exist in 1762, but casting the chart for New York City hardly changes it. NYC in 1762 is a logical choice for the capital of the then fledgling nation.

The course I'm going to follow is to look for similarities to the above in subsequent charts, and for similarities among the subsequent charts. The idea is that repetition (not only duplication, but other ways as well) brings about the promise of the previous chart(s). As indicated this will be a bit chart heavy.

We'll start with the Conjunction of 1980. There were three I think and we'll stick with the first one.

December 31, 1980

4:26 PM EST (9:26 PM GMT)

Washington DC

4 Cancer rises

Notice the angles are in the same signs as the 1762 conjunction. The degrees are also close. The Sun - Mercury conjunction is conjunct the 1762 Moon, and therefore squares the 1762 conjunction itself. Aspects to the conjunction indicate events that might have general or at least widespread effects, as this aspect is the same throughout the world. Aspects, and repetitions of angles however pin the events to the specific location. If we get enough action on the angles at Washington, it is not unreasonable to expect nationwide effects as Washington DC is the US Capitol.

We know what the 1980s brought - the end of he cold war, but the seeds for future events are in this chart as well and the indications of when they will be brought to fruition will be shown in future charts.

September 11, 2001 Event

8:46 AM EDT

NY, NY

The nodal axis falls on the ASC - DSC axis of the 1980 conjunction. The Sun at 18 Virgo falls on the 1762 IC. Mars god of war has just entered the sign of his exaltation, and (I scarcely believe I am going to write this - but this is not the traditional forum) he is in a partile conjunction with the 1762 Pluto.

Why not the 2000 Grand conjunction? Not yet. These things unfold slowly and the 9/11 attacks occurred less than 18 months after the 2000 conjunction, so for now we'll work with 1980.

Partial Solar Eclipse

September 11, 2007

8:44 am

New York, NY

11 Libra 24 rises

Solar Fire gives 8:31 AM, which is probably maximum obscurity. The above time is for exact conjunction. This is a bit eerie, but explainable. The time above is two minutes less than the time of day usually given for the first attack. So the angles and position of the Sun and therefore the eclipse are about the same as those on the day of the attack. But this isn't a prearranged event. It is a solar eclipse. It occurs on a Tuesday as well, and the attacks occurred on a Tuesday.

Mercury in this chart is in partile conjunction to the 1980 conjunction point. He is also tightly conjunct the ASC as he was in 2001. The eclipse point is in partile conjunction to the 1762 IC, which is less than five degrees from the 1980 IC. The eclipse point and the 2001 event Sun falls on the antiscion of the 1762 conjunction itself, which is the DSC of the eclipse chart when cast for NY. The 7th is often associated with war and antiscion is behind the scenes activity.

What is striking is that the eclipse does not appear to be picking up anything of the 2000 grand conjunction that occurred at 22 Taurus. That chart

Grand Conjunction 2000

May 28, 2000

12:04 PM EDT

Washington, DC

Has all the classic planets above the horizon. The angles are not picking up anything of previous grand conjunctions. The only connection I saw was the nodal axis falls exactly on the 2nd house – 8th house axis of the 1980 conjunction. From this I conclude that the 2000 conjunction will manifest through lesser charts or lesser events than those put in motion on September 11, 2001. We would have to find the relevant charts and they might be in grand conjunction charts we have not considered.

As for September 11, 2007, it is highly unlikely that any event will occur on precisely that day. It’s not impossible of course, but I think it unlikely. The eclipse is more of a starting point to understand subsequent events. We would have to check lunations and transits that occur between that date and the next eclipse, Feb 7, 2008, to try to pinpoint an actual date and perhaps place of an event. That is more work than I’m willing to do tonight.

Something t think about: one pundit has opined, and admitted it is purely his opinion, not based on any inside information, that G.W. Bush will not leave office with a nuclear Iran. If this is the case, and for now it is pure speculation, we can safely assume Iran will not give up any nuclear weaponry either functional or in production, voluntarily. This leaves military attack as the only way to accomplish this alleged goal. W’s time in office is growing shorter and will end, via Constitutional Law, on January 20, 2009.

There are other possibilities for the meaning of the upcoming eclipse, but the 2007 eclipse point falling on both the 1762 conjunction point by antiscion and that point being the 7th house of the eclipse, indicate, at least superficially, more war. Iran is simply the most logical candidate for the open enemy indicated by the DSC. A look at Iran’s chart would be worthwhile, too.

If anyone is interested, a look at the other grand conjunctions that occurred in 1980 and 2000 are probably worth a peek using the 1980 and 1762 charts for basic reference.

Any comments would be appreciated.

Tom