H.r. 1955: Violent Radicalization And Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act Of 2007

[Scales]

H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007

If this passes into law it would allow federal intimidation towards free-speech:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?t...;bill=h110-1955

H.R. 1955 really does a great job of complimenting all of this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Comm...ons_Act_of_2006

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act

It's obvious that the principles this country was founded on are going down the drain like the polluted water supplied to troops by Halliburton.

Anyways here's some highly recommended documentaries, since if H.R. 1955 passes, they might become illegal.

Iraq For Sale by Robert Greenwald

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6...h&plindex=0

ENDGAME by Alex Jones

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=10...h&plindex=0

Terrorstorm by Alex Jones

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=78...h&plindex=0

The Corporation (3 hrs) written by Joel Bakan, and co-directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=19...h&plindex=1

[ttogreh]

Scales, is your powder dry, and your gun barrel clean? We might have to go fascist hunting before the end of this decade...

[know_buddy_kares]

fuck yeah!!!! That's what I'm talking about.

[Scales]

H.R. 1955 quotes in it's defense:

`(8) Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents.

Luckily, The Military Commissions Act of 2006 takes care of that quickly.

The subject that obviously concerns me is "ideologically based violence."

`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.

All action, including violence, has to be based on ideas. No stress, no double-speak. So sticking with the word violence:

The term `violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.

Ah, now it makes sense, under this law the *federal definition* of violence is an action, or any idea perceived as a violent plan or threat. In accordance with other legislation passed because of the war and historical accounts in recent overseas prisons, this law potentially threatens detainment, torture, and death to U.S. citizens by federal law and the department of homeland security. If I'm reading it wrong then I have no idea what a commission to study "ideologically based violence" would be formed for, since it seems likely they'd be studying bullshit.

Scales, is your powder dry, and your gun barrel clean? We might have to go fascist hunting before the end of this decade...

Lol. Well if everyone who was guilty of something would just go quail hunting with Cheney this whole mess might get sorted out, then Cheney could get arrested and the necromancer that raised Cheney from the dead could become the president for the remainder of 2008. (I kid.)

fuck yeah!!!! That's what I'm talking about.

Yeah. From that documentary on Iraq and Halliburton, it seems like the best way to support United States troops would be to let them be jurors in the eventual trials for anyone who was a profiteering criminal in the war on terror.