Jump to content

Michigan city bans being annoying in public


Recommended Posts

Posted

BRIGHTON, Mich. – Ticking someone off could get you a ticket in one Michigan city. The Brighton City Council on Thursday approved an ordinance allowing police in the Livingston County community to ticket and fine anyone who is annoying in public "by word of mouth, sign or motions."

The Livingston County Daily Press & Argus of Howell reports the measure is modeled on a similar ordinance in the Detroit suburb of Royal Oak.

A city attorney says there could be situations where the measure would violate freedom of speech, but that those cases will be reviewed by the city.

The ban takes effect Jan. 2.

Posted

hey...brighton, MI....FUCK YOU...LMFAO

btw....how cool is this: :robo:

Posted

The very definition of freedom means that somebody will be annoyed by your actions. Who gets to decide what is acceptable and what is not?

"A city attorney says there could be situations where the measure would violate freedom of speech, but that those cases will be reviewed by the city."

So by exercising your rights, somebody will get pissed off, then you will get cited and given a ticket, then you have to fight it in court to prove that your actions were guaranteed legal by the US Constitution, and you just lost precious time and money of your life that you're never getting back, all because you live a life of freedom and that annoyed somebody? Sounds pretty annoying to me. I say we cite whoever created this stupid ordinance.

Paraphrasing Ben Franklin, "Anyone who would give up a little liberty to gain a little security deserves neither and is sure to lose both."

Posted

"mellow out or you will pay ..."

Jello FTW!

Posted

The very definition of freedom means that somebody will be annoyed by your actions. Who gets to decide what is acceptable and what is not?

"A city attorney says there could be situations where the measure would violate freedom of speech, but that those cases will be reviewed by the city."

So by exercising your rights, somebody will get pissed off, then you will get cited and given a ticket, then you have to fight it in court to prove that your actions were guaranteed legal by the US Constitution, and you just lost precious time and money of your life that you're never getting back, all because you live a life of freedom and that annoyed somebody? Sounds pretty annoying to me. I say we cite whoever created this stupid ordinance.

Paraphrasing Ben Franklin, "Anyone who would give up a little liberty to gain a little security deserves neither and is sure to lose both."

I'm surprised someone hasn't already challenged this ordinance, and the one in R.O. as unconstitutional. Maybe they have.

Posted

I'm surprised someone hasn't already challenged this ordinance, and the one in R.O. as unconstitutional. Maybe they have.

Declaring something "unconstitutional" is annoying. I'm reporting you. :detective:

Posted

I'm surprised someone hasn't already challenged this ordinance, and the one in R.O. as unconstitutional. Maybe they have.

as if this society isn't litigious enough, we have this looming...

Declaring something "unconstitutional" is annoying. I'm reporting you. :detective:

now now, it isn't worth the paperwork...

Posted

Good thing this ordinance isn't in the D. About 300 drunk Santas and helpers would have been sitting in the poke! :p

Posted

Good thing this ordinance isn't in the D. About 300 drunk Santas and helpers would have been sitting in the poke! :p

LOL, you are probably right. I think that you have to shoot someone in the D anymore to even get the police's attention.

Posted

The very definition of freedom means that somebody will be annoyed by your actions. Who gets to decide what is acceptable and what is not?

"A city attorney says there could be situations where the measure would violate freedom of speech, but that those cases will be reviewed by the city."

So by exercising your rights, somebody will get pissed off, then you will get cited and given a ticket, then you have to fight it in court to prove that your actions were guaranteed legal by the US Constitution, and you just lost precious time and money of your life that you're never getting back, all because you live a life of freedom and that annoyed somebody? Sounds pretty annoying to me. I say we cite whoever created this stupid ordinance.

Paraphrasing Ben Franklin, "Anyone who would give up a little liberty to gain a little security deserves neither and is sure to lose both."

+1

Posted

if they passed that law here, nobody could ever leave their house!! :X

Posted

Sounds communist.

$$

Posted

yeah, there would be some serious ghost towns all around if this was an easily enforceable ordinance...lol

Posted

if they passed that law here, nobody could ever leave their house!! :X

I would be in jail for life. :yes

Posted

I am really really glad that I am NEVER annoying :coffee:

Posted

I am really really glad that I am NEVER annoying :coffee:

me too

Posted

me too

*high five*

Posted

*high five*

That's annoying. Too bad you're not in Brighton.

Posted

That's annoying. Too bad you're not in Brighton.

No its not

Posted

That's annoying. Too bad you're not in Brighton.

don't tell phee he is annoying. that's annoying.

Posted

Good thing I only live just outside the city limit, otherwise my parties would get annoying to them. Then they might come with the fairycops and take all of you away and then torture me by making me teabag a block of dry ice. *shudders*

Posted

Good thing I only live just outside the city limit, otherwise my parties would get annoying to them. Then they might come with the fairycops and take all of you away and then torture me by making me teabag a block of dry ice. *shudders*

that last line made me laugh. ooh wait thats annoying. hmm wait my shirt with a corpse on it is annoying.

Posted

Fuck Brighton.

Posted

LOL, you are probably right. I think that you have to shoot someone in the D anymore to even get the police's attention.

Not even that does it.

When I was 21 I shot a home intruder in my kitchen. Detroit Police never showed up.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    821.8k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 63 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TronRP
      ~~~~~ Wow.  I hope that works out for you.  Will you be moving your ranch there?
    • TronRP
      6:15pm - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 22 Guests(See full list) TronRP
    • Soulrev
      I'm thinking I'm going to be moving to AZ, soon! Can't wait! I friggin' love it here! The heat doesn't bother me at all and the best part? NO SNOW!!! (S.N.O.W. - Shit  No One Wants)   Been staying in Bullhead City where the kids and grandkids live. Next, we're going to the wife's cousin's which is a ways North of Kingman, in the middle of nowhere, where we actually plan to move.   I really like Bullhead. It's a nice little town. Not overcrowded like Colorado Springs has become, at all. Very light traffic, reasonable prices on everything, low taxes, etc. The river offers a lot to do, with a lot of beaches and campgrounds all around it.   But yeah even though we've been over 110º-115º F just about every day,  I can handle it!  What I can't handle anymore, is snow and being cold. Just tired of it. Give me the desert over a blizzard any day!    
    • kat
      I'm at a weird stage in life right now.
    • kat
      Nope, we wasn't doing anything. I didn't want to go by myself.  I ended up doing karaoke here. It would of been a perfect day to go, though. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.