phee Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 It's only the American Bar Association The White House immediately disagreed with the ABA and rejected its rating. Not counting the latest ratings, just six of nearly 200 nominees since 2003 have received a rating of "not qualified." I am never suprised any more
Msterbeau Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 "Mike Wallace is a well-respected attorney with extensive experience in constitutional and commercial law," What he doesn't have is any experience as a judge. Next nominee please!!
phee Posted May 11, 2006 Author Posted May 11, 2006 An unanimous "not qualified" rating is rare from the ABA, which has graded judicial candidates since the 1950s on three factors: integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament Wow
Hellion Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 It's only the American Bar AssociationI am never suprised any more <{POST_SNAPBACK}> :devil Me Neither.
Scary Guy Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 :devil Me Neither. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> LOL Amarican B.A.R. 5 points to anyone who can tell me what those letters stand for.
Shade Everdark Posted May 11, 2006 Posted May 11, 2006 LOL Amarican B.A.R. 5 points to anyone who can tell me what those letters stand for. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uh, Browning Automatic Rife?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.