Carl Rove is Leaking

[Paper Hearts]

Are you aware of all the International laws that the United States is in violation of (such as State sanctioned execution of minors-a catergory we lead the word in)? Those resolutions, no matter how numerous, belonged to the UN and were thiers to enforce. The UN voted against our proposal to invade which would add the Iraq war to our list of international violations...

Since Bush has been president we've lost many freedoms here and are in danger of losing even more. Let's not get into other issues such as the environment, the economy, etc. -Women are allowed to vote in Lebanon because of Bush, you say? Oh but what about the all of the blacks here who's votes were not counted, etc?

It's funny that Bush gets support anywhere.

[The_Dark]

Oh but what about the all of the blacks here who's votes were not counted, etc?

You might wnat to do a bit more research... When the elections were investigated last time for voter fraud and voter intimidation.. All the reports came back saying that it was in fact the Democrats that were trying to cheat. Why do you think the Dems and the left dropped the subject so fast after the election?

What pretext was disproven? The only one that was disproven was that Saddam ws trying to get weapons grade materials from Niger. And that is still up for debate if you read EVERYTHING that has been documented about it. And even if it was untrue, That doesn't mean it was a lie. The CIA, M5, and every other major secret service that was investigating Iraq reported the same thing. You somehow blame that absolutly huge mistake on the one man rather than on the thousands of investigators from all over the world.

BS9... You forgot Lybia.

[The_Dark]

Almost forgot.. The UN did NOT vote against our resolution to force. It never got voted on. France threatened to Vtwo if i came to vote.

[Paper Hearts]

So are you saying that if a country wanted to have a war against us for a reason that was not true, and after their invasion had already been begun and their reson was then proven wrong, it'd be okay for them to go back and say "well...but they were in violation of this, this and this, too, you know?" ?

Not every little thing necessitates violence and certainly not speculation or underhanded, coniving, false pretenses. It seems to me that if you are going to strike first you should at least know that what you are striking over is true, and if it's my ass you're sending over there, you'd better be damn sure. I don't think the majority of the world are under the illusion that we're just trigger happy, freedom loving people...

[Paper Hearts]

and election fraud has been no secret in this nation the last couple times around...I'm sure you've read a bit more than that.

Bush said "They've got WMD, I know they've got WMD and I'll take full responsibility". What happened to him taking responsibility?

[The_Dark]

The Democrats lost the last two elections because they put forth canidates that people could not stand behind. You want to win an election yuo ahve to have a good canidate. Kerry was not that person. Gore was almost that person.

The worst cases of election fruad in this country have been carried out by the Democratic party. Thousands DEAD people casting votes comes to mind.

And yes, I did read about all the bad stuff that happened in the last couple elections. Voter intimidation by the Democratic party and Liberal groups seems to have topped the list. Those things were proven. The Republicans were accused of many things, but none of it was proven.

[Paper Hearts]

I agree. The Democrats do not even believe in themselves. But there were issues of fraud with both elections from plots to decieve people into voting in the wrong area (certain ethnic groups who rarely vote with conservatives) to ballots from particular areas simply being thrown away to peoples being turned away at the polls for false reasons.

[Jarodaka]

Fuck the U.N.

Ok, carry on.